A vibrant rice paddy field with an irrigation canal under a cloudy sky, offering a serene rural landscape.

Assessing structural uncertainty in water–human systems: A multi-model ensemble approach for agricultural water management

Abstract

Coupled hydro-economic models are increasingly used to support agricultural water management, yet their results can be highly sensitive to structural (model-form) choices in both human and water systems. We analyze how structural uncertainty propagates across a modular coupled human–water system model by building a hydrological multi-model ensemble for an irrigated catchment in Spain’s Douro basin (Tormes). The ensemble combines alternative hydrological models (Hydrologic Engineering Center’s Hydrologic Modeling System (HECHMS) and two Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) configurations) with four mathematical-programming representations of irrigator behavior (two Positive Mathematical Programming models and two Multi-attribute models) through a standardized coupling protocol that translates crop choices and irrigation demand into water-system inputs. We evaluate coupled performance of daily reservoir storage and harmonized diagnostics under two drought scenarios and four volumetric water charge levels based on standardized anomalies (z-scores).
Results show that model structural uncertainty cascades through the ensemble and concentrates around irrigation onset, producing storage spreads of approximately 150–202 million m³ across coupled configurations, equivalent to 31–41% of Santa Teresa’s maximum permitted storage and 95–127% of annual downstream irrigation demand. Hydrological model choice explains most of this spread: family median differences reach 1.88–2.12 z-score units, meaning that the central tendency of standardized monthly storage anomalies shifts by almost two standard deviations depending on the hydrological structure selected. Economic-model structure mainly modulates within-family variability through heterogeneous water-demand signals. These findings imply that single-model decision support can underestimate the range of plausible futures and bias policy appraisal. We argue that systematically assessing model structural uncertainty through multi-model ensembles can strengthen robust decision-making on agricultural water management under drought and water charge interventions.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.